3 ms·
What a sensationalist title, I was expecting a comparison with other surveillance law in others countries and the result to be something outrageous. Turns out
by bigbugbag 10y ago
What a sensationalist title, I was expecting a comparison with other surveillance law in others countries and the result to be something outrageous.
Turns out it's just sensationalism and it ends up being the kind of surveillance that has been enacted around the world in the last few years, mandatory ISP data retention has been active for 10 years in France[1].
It was even a European directive, directive 2006/24/EC or data retention directive[2], for all members of the European Union from 2006 to 2014 when it was invalidated through the Court of Justice of European Union. Interestingly this directive came into existence while the Uk had the presidency of EU in 2005.
>According to the directive, member states will have to store citizens' telecommunications data for a minimum of 6 months and at most 24 months.
Why is zdnet trying to put this UK law as if it was something out of the ordinary ?
Switzerland[3], Canada's bill C-51[4], Germany[5], Australia[6], Italy[7], and more [8] (Estonia, Greece, Spain, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Ireland) all have mandatory data retention law.
Then again none of those are actual democracies (the closest being switzerland) and that's pretty much the reason these laws made to spy on citizens are possible.
[1]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_on_the_fight_against_terrorism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_on_the_fight_against_terro...
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Retention_Directive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Retention_Directive
[3]: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37465853 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37465853
[4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-terrorism_Act,_2015 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-terrorism_Act,_2015
[5]: https://www.huntonprivacyblog.com/2015/10/16/german-parliament-adopts-data-retention-law-with-localization-requirement/ https://www.huntonprivacyblog.com/2015/10/16/german-parliame...
[6]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_(Interception_and_Access)_Amendment_(Data_Retention)_Act_2015 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_(Intercepti...
[7]: https://edri.org/edrigramnumber3-16italy/ https://edri.org/edrigramnumber3-16italy/
[8]: https://www.purevpn.com/blog/data-retention-laws-by-countries/ https://www.purevpn.com/blog/data-retention-laws-by-countrie...
- fdkz 10y ago> Why is zdnet trying to put this UK law as if it was something out of the ordinary ? Because the 2006/24/EC data retention directive [1] didn't say anything about browsing history and even then was invalidated by the Court of Justice of European Union. The new UK law however: "The law will force internet providers to record every internet customer's top-level web history in real-time for up to a year, which can be accessed by numerous government departments; force companies to decrypt data on demand -- though the government has never been that clear on exactly how it forces foreign firms to do that; and even disclose any new security features in products before they launch." [1] http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:105:0054:0063:EN:PDF http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2... (read "Article 5" "Categories of data to be retained")