> It's unfortunate that you've chosen to try and make the scope smaller by referring specifically to "memory safety". Okay, back to the broader scope - what's

> It's unfortunate that you've chosen to try and make the scope smaller by referring specifically to "memory safety". Okay, back to the broader scope - what's an area that you think Rust might do worse than C++ at? I'd be very interested in fixing any blind spots I might have.