"Authentic" does not always equal "worth publishing", of course. I have no problem with them publishing stuff that's legitimately concerning. But a lot of the

"Authentic" does not always equal "worth publishing", of course. I have no problem with them publishing stuff that's legitimately concerning. But a lot of the Clinton leaks (and I'm no Clinton fan) seemed to me like little more than doxxing, in the full knowledge that the emails would pick up a tinge of scandal by association simply because they showed up on WikiLeaks.