4 ms·
Something I find interesting about this: what does it mean for countries who monitor and filter/block content (think China)? Presumably since this isn't using t
by icehawk219 10y ago
Something I find interesting about this: what does it mean for countries who monitor and filter/block content (think China)? Presumably since this isn't using their national infrastructure they would lose all control of it, no? I wonder how those countries would respond to SpaceX wanting to let their citizens use the service. Unless I'm missing something it seems to me like they wouldn't really be able to stop it.
- andkenneth 10y agoI would imagine that they wouldn't be able to sell the hardware in china without a contract to redirect traffic through a terrestrial station that's inside the great wall. I doubt that's feasible.
- talamown 10y agoA government still can get control practically. They cannot stop the service itself but can regulate payments from their citizens to the service. It is like online casino. Of course, there may be some loopholes for payment and some citizens who access the service as well as online casino.
- lelandbatey 10y agoOne example of a loophole: Pay with Bitcoin/have someone on the outside of censorship pay for the service and you pay them, then you connect with those paid for credentials.
- rezashirazian 10y agoWhat if SpaceX offers a free tier version. They can possibly double internet traffic with a flip of a switch.
- taneq 10y agoPut three generations of your family in jail if they catch you?
- 1952wasntU 10y agoIn order to xmit they need licensed spectrum from the government.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- lvs 10y agoThey can always jam whatever bands it operates on. They can make it illegal to tx/rx in those bands.
- metafunctor 10y agoI'm imagining a super narrow directional beam pointed at the satellites. You cannot jam that, and even detecting it would mean you need to be really close. It can still be made illegal, of course.
- ansible 10y agoA bad actor could also use a super narrow beam pointed at the satellite as a jamming signal that saturates the receiver, which prevents reception or even damages the satellite. Depends on the power.
- Matumio 10y agoI don't know what technology you need to track and hit low-orbit satellites with a narrow beam, but I bet it's not as cheap as a dish?
- lvs 10y agoNah, it wouldn't be that hard to jam the inbound signal, especially within cities. The sat can't really focus a beam in the way you're imagining.
- gozur88 10y agoMost likely SpaceX will do what those governments require. It's trying to charge for the service, after all, and that means going through normal financial channels.
- inimino 10y agoJust make the necessary hardware illegal to sell or own and the problem is solved.
- namlem 10y agoYou need base stations to receive the signal. Governments could potentially limit access to those.