4 ms·

WCD would have been valuable w/o downloads, just the collages alone are an incredible source of curation.

rileyt 10y ago
what do you think gave the collages more value than a playlist on something like spotify? i definitely think they felt more valuable, but cant place exactly why.
- joecool1029 10y ago
  Put simply: They were more complete. Spotify's library isn't even close to what WCD's was and is missing some copies of tracks/albums and/or just has the wrong versions flat out.
  - jimbo999 10y ago
    Can't agree with this more. And the efforts of hundreds of thousands of engaged music fans who deleted bad tags, promoted good ones, made the connections.
    - nibnib 10y ago
      It's frustrating sending fixes to Spotify when you come across something incorrect. It takes so long for any action to be taken that I've given up.
- thirdsun 10y ago
  I think it's the audience, the people participating. What.cd had a lot of very enthusiastic, competent, knowledgeable users while Spotify features a rather mainstream, general user base that takes a more passive role when it comes to music and its discovery. Obviously results will differ. Furthermore, Spotify hardly provides any tools to promote and showcase a high quality, carefully compiled playlist. I can share a link, sure, but that's the most basic of paths to new potential listeners.
- rublev 10y ago
  Exclusivity. You had to earn the right to make a collage, and even then you only had a few so you really needed to put thought into it.
bobince 10y ago
What.cd to me was a live feed of every piece of music released anywhere, tagged well enough that I could go through each week and pick out potentially interesting things I had never heard before. Whether I actually use the downloads or not, it allowed me to discover new bands, new genres, and music from different cultures that I would never have been able to listen to before. Where is the commercial service that offers anything close to this?

what do you think gave the collages more value than a playlist on something like spotify? i definitely think they felt more valuable, but cant place exactly why.

joecool1029 10y ago
Put simply: They were more complete. Spotify's library isn't even close to what WCD's was and is missing some copies of tracks/albums and/or just has the wrong versions flat out.
- jimbo999 10y ago
  Can't agree with this more. And the efforts of hundreds of thousands of engaged music fans who deleted bad tags, promoted good ones, made the connections.
  - nibnib 10y ago
    It's frustrating sending fixes to Spotify when you come across something incorrect. It takes so long for any action to be taken that I've given up.
thirdsun 10y ago
I think it's the audience, the people participating. What.cd had a lot of very enthusiastic, competent, knowledgeable users while Spotify features a rather mainstream, general user base that takes a more passive role when it comes to music and its discovery. Obviously results will differ. Furthermore, Spotify hardly provides any tools to promote and showcase a high quality, carefully compiled playlist. I can share a link, sure, but that's the most basic of paths to new potential listeners.
rublev 10y ago
Exclusivity. You had to earn the right to make a collage, and even then you only had a few so you really needed to put thought into it.

bobince 10y ago

What.cd to me was a live feed of every piece of music released anywhere, tagged well enough that I could go through each week and pick out potentially interesting things I had never heard before. Whether I actually use the downloads or not, it allowed me to discover new bands, new genres, and music from different cultures that I would never have been able to listen to before. Where is the commercial service that offers anything close to this?