3 ms·
> We'd survive. But the plants and animals we depend on probably wouldn't have a very good time... I'm not sure how you can reconcile these two adjacent statem
by stouset 10y ago
> We'd survive. But the plants and animals we depend on probably wouldn't have a very good time...
I'm not sure how you can reconcile these two adjacent statements.
Yes, some humans would undoubtedly exist somewhere. But only a tiny fraction of our current world population.
- mike10010100 10y ago> Yes, some humans would undoubtedly exist somewhere. That's called survival.
- stouset 10y agoOh come on, you're just splitting hairs at this point. Pockets of a few thousand people is, yes, technically survival. Congratulations, you're "technically correct" — the most useless, pedantically, and antisocial kind of correct. The original question was "how is 8˚C "not much worse" than 4˚C? Surely you can concede that "tens of thousands of humans" and "zero humans" are not so much different compared to today's "billions of humans".