> That is ridiculous. We've had gender separated restrooms for the longest time. Actually that's pretty modern, historically. And thanks for telling me what my

> That is ridiculous. We've had gender separated restrooms for the longest time. Actually that's pretty modern, historically. And thanks for telling me what my gender is, I really needed the guidance. > Since the Constitution doesn't say anything about sexual relations or orientation at all, it devolves to state rights. State rights and the People. I don't feel the need to make a moral argument about human rights on this issue, but I am sure one could be made. > Get over yourself. When a majority of people in a political jurisdiction believe a certain thing, either learn to live with it or move. The majority is not always right, and democracy does not mean "majority rules". Also appeal to tradition is a fallacy, not a valid argument. > I repeat points in the media because they make sense. The triumph of rationalization over empiricism is nearly complete. > Ad hominem much? I have not attacked you personally at all Right, that thing where you said all trans people are insane or faking it was not in any sense a personal reflection. You do seem to be persisting in that belief though, which again does not reflect empirical reality. You are insisting that laws be made on the basis of your feelings -- and then blaming your opponents for it.