What you say about history may well be true, but burning a man alive because of something he said is enough to doom any other organization. > an easy one since

What you say about history may well be true, but burning a man alive because of something he said is enough to doom any other organization. > an easy one since slandering the Church is acceptable and even respectable today Slandering the church... They have opposed science... molested children and protected molesters... Started wars... controlled countries... and if you are an atheist you might think that the very idea of religion is peddling in lies. I happen to think that. Any secular group protecting molesters or starting a single war would not exist long enough to be slandered. They committed crimes and rode Jesus to avoid prosecution. Many of those individuals died hundreds of years and avoided justice, but the organization that enabled it still exists. > It's all too common that people think it's okay to slander anyone you don't like or disagree with. I am not for slandering the church. I acknowledge that the organized religions are a net loss for humanity and I would see them dismantled. What little good they do I would see replaced with secular institutions that are accountable for their negative actions. You never hear about a school, corporation or non-profit NGO immolating or imprisoning people they disagree with. A group of otherwise moral people burning a human alive requires god.