5 ms·
>There ought to be like a "didn't read the article" link next to the comment people can click to quickly bury those comments. There is, it's the downvote butto
by hueving 10y ago
>There ought to be like a "didn't read the article" link next to the comment people can click to quickly bury those comments.
There is, it's the downvote button. The distinction of why a downvote is useless.
- wst_ 10y agoWhat are the requirements to be able to down vote?
- nothrabannosir 10y agoa karma threshold. 800 or something?
- EdwardCoffin 10y ago500, I only just gained downvote ability in the past few weeks, when I finally gained more than 500. Edit: another thing I should have mentioned is that it seemed to me that only those comments made after I gained this ability were downvotable, the thread my last few comments were in was sprinkled with downvotable comments, which were newer, and non-downvotable comments which were there before mine. I might have been imagining this or be mistaken though.
- itp 10y agoAs a data point, I am at _exactly_ 500 right now, and cannot downvote. So perhaps you have to exceed 500? EDIT: checking again at 507 and I now have the power to downvote. So there's our answer (plus my moderately shameless play for some upvotes worked).
- grzm 10y agoYup. 501. Remember. With great power comes great responsibility.
- mannykannot 10y agoIndeed - compared with the ability to speak freely, the ability to downvote is not much of a privilege.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- paulddraper 10y agoCouncil of 300 https://xkcd.com/1224/ https://xkcd.com/1224/
- thesimpsons1022 10y agothe real question is if it goes away if you're downvoted.
- grzm 10y agoI believe it does, but don't have any evidence to back it up. If itp volunteers, we could test by down voting his comments :)
- jmsmistral 10y agoExactly... This effect might reinforce 'upvote'-grabbing behavior, to either not lose the ability, or regain downvote if lost.
- dajohnson89 10y agoUpvote-grabbing behavior is already rampant here, just as with any forum with point tallies attached to comments. Proof: all of the "edit: why the downvotes?" comments.
- nkurz 10y agoit seemed to me that only those comments made after I gained this ability were downvotable I think you might be mistaken. You might not have noticed yet that the downvote option disappears on its own a set time (24 hours, I think) after the comment was made. Perhaps it was only the comments older than this threshold that were non-votable?
- EdwardCoffin 10y agoThat's quite possible. I had not realized that the downvote option disappeared so quickly. I think my karma accrued overnight, so when I noticed I'd exceeded the threshold a lot of the thread was perhaps a day old. The only thing I am relatively certain of is that some of the older comments in the thread were not downvotable, and the newer ones were.
- renaudg 10y agoonly those comments made after I gained this ability were downvotable That would be quite computationally intensive to implement.
- sundvor 10y agoNot if you store the timestamp of when you gain downvote rights, and compare against that.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- aaron695 10y ago> The distinction of why a downvote is useless. Actually I think it would be incredible useful. You could use it to shift a community to a more useful direction. A more direct way of eliminating common errors. If on a cool new tech that's renewable if someone starts another bloody global warming discussion being able to downvote as OT could try and keep people on topic rather than having to down vote something you agree with. There are issues with the idea, it can become censorshop, but I find it an interesting one.
- brazzledazzle 10y agoThey could just make flagging dual purpose. But flagged comments probably alert the admins. Maybe clicking the flag button could spawn a drop down but I think there might be an aversion to introducing complexity and impedance. Requiring multiple clicks and using drop down elements might be a departure from the deliberate simplicity.
- m0nty 10y agoColorize according to votes. Purple = off-topic. Red = troll. Orange = weird and scary. You could blend colors too. Reddish-purple = off-topic troll. Dark orange = weird and scary troll. etc.
- bhdz 10y ago>There is, it's the downvote button. The distinction of why a downvote is useless. How about a tag system associated with each posting? Then you can have just a scalar "weight" and a set of keywords (string labels), each with a designated meaning. You press a "plus" button or something, and a menu with optional tagging pops up (tag clouds can be used). Some tags could be "spam", others could be "didn't read" and users can build their own threshold filters for tags. (0) spam; (4) didn't read; (3) incomplete; ...
- grzm 10y agoI've thought about this, too. In particular, I'd like to, say, separately up vote "substantive" and down vote "agree". That said, how complex do we really want the UX to be? As for "didn't read", if you're not interested, just move on. If you think the article is inappropriate and can, flag and move on. If you see a comment that looks like the poster didn't read the article, you can call civilly call out what is in the article, and perhaps down vote the comment.
- bhdz 10y ago> how complex? Yeah I thought about this very hard actually, and came to the conclusion that just a "weight"(+) button is enough. And, if you care that much so that you would waste your time providing more ... contextual meta-info (about the weight itself), you simply need a pop-up and a quick way to select words from a common dictionary. Certain users can even make content "more spammish" by simply increasing the weight with a click (they agree with the labeling and they are "special" in some way). This, and the weight itself should provide enough info for a comprehensive "decoration" of the postings.
- abritinthebay 10y agoSo... slashdot?
- bhdz 10y agoMmm, to be honest, I was never a slashdotter so I have no experience with it at all (strangely enough :))
- thiagowfx 10y agoI don't see a downvote button. Do you need a base reputation for that, like Stack Overflow? Edit: yeah, karma is needed.