5 ms·
I cannot comment about the content, but for music metadata there is nothing as good a http://musicbrainz.org http://musicbrainz.org . Incredible amount of data
by gioele 10y ago
I cannot comment about the content, but for music metadata there is nothing as good a http://musicbrainz.org http://musicbrainz.org .
Incredible amount of data, versioned and CC0 licensed, great and diverse community of music lovers, strong ties with archive.org.
- sosuke 10y agoI've been a MB fan for a long time, recently found these scritps, https://github.com/murdos/musicbrainz-userscripts https://github.com/murdos/musicbrainz-userscripts, to help import some other albums they were missing from https://www.discogs.com https://www.discogs.com
- disposition2 10y agoYou might also want to look at beets (http://beets.io/ http://beets.io/)
- uabstraction 10y agoI've just got started with beets. It takes a lot of work to organize a music landfill that has accumulated over 15 years, but it may be the best tool for the job - even if the job will consume man-days. MusicBrainz Picard never cut it for me.
- krick 10y agoThat's simply not true. musicbrainz tagging is quite poor, to be honest. Properly moderated music torrents (not only what.cd) in general have much better and more relevant metadata for each release. Unfortunately, it's not that available and usually requires a human to be interpreted. Discogs is vaster, but still quite disorganized. For rather obscure music you still don't have anything better than the metadata that comes with the torrent (and is required on all quality music torrent trackers).
- MrBra 10y agoYou have missed last.fm probably.