3 ms·

Do you want cheap and healthy food? Eat organic (cost more) but cook yourself and grow your on condiments. Cooking yourself it's a no-brainer, and you know exa

Do you want cheap and healthy food? Eat organic (cost more) but cook yourself and grow your on condiments. Cooking yourself it's a no-brainer, and you know exactly what you are eating. Also I have on my patio all the herbs and few vegetables (I live in a urban area in Miami, don't think I have fields behind my condo). When you go to the store you pay $3 for a couple of springs of sage, when you could buy a sage plant for $3 and keep using it all year long. And the money you save you can reinvest it in more healthy (and more expensive) food.

ErrantX 17y ago
> Eat organic (cost more) For the most part there is no real extra benefit for Organic food - assuming you are not opposed to the idea of pesticides and other treatments (which are mostly benign anyway). Personally all I require from my food is that it has been farmed ethically and preferably produced on smaller scales (i.e. no Bernard Matthews Turkey) That can save you a lot. (seconded on the cook for yourself part - it doesn't have to take long and it's a great way to unwind :D)
- bpyne 17y ago
  "For the most part there is no real extra benefit for Organic food - assuming you are not opposed to the idea of pesticides and other treatments (which are mostly benign anyway)." From a nutritional viewpoint, what you said agrees with what I've read. I think there's real worth, though, in experimenting with different farming techniques that don't rely on mass produced chemicals. Reliance on these chemicals makes me think of the "putting all your eggs in one basket" adage. Recently I heard an NPR piece about nutrition studies done across decades. One line that struck me is an apple grown in the early 20th century in the US had the nutritional value of 3 apples grown today. I'm not sure how the researchers came to that conclusion. But, if it's true and if a similar ratio applies to other produce, we have the potential for a serious health issue coming up. EDIT: Enclosed the quoted text in actual quotes for readability.
  - ErrantX 17y ago
    Yes, you're right there. As I said in my main post I think the real important thing to work on is ethical farming - regardless of organic or not. The other thing is that from a sustainability point of view (in terms of the farming infrastructure) Organic is very cost/labour intensive compared to other techniques. There is probably a good balance; as you say we can reach it by experimenting.
    - imajes 17y ago
      The problem with saying organic has no benefit is that i can always say, "DDX", and refute your argument.
      - ErrantX 17y ago
        Well you could :) but I would have no idea what you meant (a quick google didn't turn anything up). I assume your talking about some sort of chemical? Which is why I made a point of mentioning the idea of ethical farming. It's not that Organic farming has no benefit - but there isn't much extra benefit compared to properly farmed non-organic food (my extended family runs an organic farm so this is based on experience/observation). The major problem with Organic food is it is uneconomical due to more labour intensive methods, higher product failure rates, too small scale etc. As I mentioned; there is sure to be a compromise somewhere in the middle that has economical but safe farming :)
      - imajes 17y ago
        Heh- I was thinking about math and wrote DDX. What i meant to write was DDT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT caused some quite awful effects.
      - MichaelGG 17y ago
        DDT has done a ton of good, too, saving millions of lives. From the wiki article: "For example, in Sri Lanka, the program reduced cases from about 3 million per year before spraying to just 29 in 1964. Thereafter the program was halted to save money, and malaria rebounded to 600,000 cases in 1968 and the first quarter of 1969"
- briancooley 17y ago
  The immediate health benefits of organic food might be questionable, but there is little question that the fertiluzer in the runoff is detrimental to coastal areas. The article mentions this.

ErrantX 17y ago

> Eat organic (cost more) For the most part there is no real extra benefit for Organic food - assuming you are not opposed to the idea of pesticides and other treatments (which are mostly benign anyway). Personally all I require from my food is that it has been farmed ethically and preferably produced on smaller scales (i.e. no Bernard Matthews Turkey) That can save you a lot. (seconded on the cook for yourself part - it doesn't have to take long and it's a great way to unwind :D)

bpyne 17y ago
"For the most part there is no real extra benefit for Organic food - assuming you are not opposed to the idea of pesticides and other treatments (which are mostly benign anyway)." From a nutritional viewpoint, what you said agrees with what I've read. I think there's real worth, though, in experimenting with different farming techniques that don't rely on mass produced chemicals. Reliance on these chemicals makes me think of the "putting all your eggs in one basket" adage. Recently I heard an NPR piece about nutrition studies done across decades. One line that struck me is an apple grown in the early 20th century in the US had the nutritional value of 3 apples grown today. I'm not sure how the researchers came to that conclusion. But, if it's true and if a similar ratio applies to other produce, we have the potential for a serious health issue coming up. EDIT: Enclosed the quoted text in actual quotes for readability.
- ErrantX 17y ago
  Yes, you're right there. As I said in my main post I think the real important thing to work on is ethical farming - regardless of organic or not. The other thing is that from a sustainability point of view (in terms of the farming infrastructure) Organic is very cost/labour intensive compared to other techniques. There is probably a good balance; as you say we can reach it by experimenting.
  - imajes 17y ago
    The problem with saying organic has no benefit is that i can always say, "DDX", and refute your argument.
    - ErrantX 17y ago
      Well you could :) but I would have no idea what you meant (a quick google didn't turn anything up). I assume your talking about some sort of chemical? Which is why I made a point of mentioning the idea of ethical farming. It's not that Organic farming has no benefit - but there isn't much extra benefit compared to properly farmed non-organic food (my extended family runs an organic farm so this is based on experience/observation). The major problem with Organic food is it is uneconomical due to more labour intensive methods, higher product failure rates, too small scale etc. As I mentioned; there is sure to be a compromise somewhere in the middle that has economical but safe farming :)
    - imajes 17y ago
      Heh- I was thinking about math and wrote DDX. What i meant to write was DDT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT caused some quite awful effects.
    - MichaelGG 17y ago
      DDT has done a ton of good, too, saving millions of lives. From the wiki article: "For example, in Sri Lanka, the program reduced cases from about 3 million per year before spraying to just 29 in 1964. Thereafter the program was halted to save money, and malaria rebounded to 600,000 cases in 1968 and the first quarter of 1969"
briancooley 17y ago
The immediate health benefits of organic food might be questionable, but there is little question that the fertiluzer in the runoff is detrimental to coastal areas. The article mentions this.