"Google eventually accepted a CTS patch to check for the ADUPS system socket. That should have solved the problem, but then Mediatek just changed the name of th

"Google eventually accepted a CTS patch to check for the ADUPS system socket. That should have solved the problem, but then Mediatek just changed the name of the socket to purposely evade Google’s CTS check." That just left me gaping at the sheer brass required to do this, but I understand how it could happen. I'm sure there are some people who want to fix the problem, and others who say "Why bother? We may lose a few technically savvy (aka pain in the neck) end users, but the great unwashed are never going to know or care about whether this was fixed. Our customers know that their customers are the great unwashed, so they aren't going to care either as long as we're cheaper for them." Or TL;DR, "Screw 'em, what are they going to do, organize a boycott by people who think chips are something you eat?"