4 ms·
Pretty ironic to advocate a "gold standard" when their website looks like early-2000's MSDN.
by minxomat 10y ago
Pretty ironic to advocate a "gold standard" when their website looks like early-2000's MSDN.
- Kenji 10y agoI think you're mistaken. The site tries to be modern by including 'material design' elements. I'm not gonna lie, I think it's extremely ugly and cluttered, but functional.
- wolfgke 10y agoWhat is considered as good design depends a lot on the zeitgeist and culture. For example in Asia (e.g. China, but also Japan) there is a rather different taste what is considered as a well-designed website: https://econsultancy.com/blog/67466-why-do-chinese-websites-look-so-busy/ https://econsultancy.com/blog/67466-why-do-chinese-websites-... http://blog.teamtreehouse.com/why-is-chinese-web-design-so-bad http://blog.teamtreehouse.com/why-is-chinese-web-design-so-b... https://randomwire.com/why-japanese-web-design-is-so-different/ https://randomwire.com/why-japanese-web-design-is-so-differe...