4 ms·
Behind on of the two tweets, there's a few hundrend years of slavery & oppression, based on race. Context is important. Edit: Why do I even bother. That same b
by orcdork 10y ago
Behind on of the two tweets, there's a few hundrend years of slavery & oppression, based on race. Context is important.
Edit: Why do I even bother. That same blog has the following snippet in another post:
The white nations of Europe are, collectively and historically speaking, humanity's golden geese. It is to the long-term benefit of all Mankind to avoid killing them, or even adulterating them, through immigration, invasion, or assimilation.
Sigh.
- 67726e 10y agoYou realize that white Americans were not the only folks to own slaves or oppress a people, right? Ask yourself this, would the results be different if I tweeted that from the Barbary coast were roles were largely reversed? How about from a SLAVic nation?
- orcdork 10y agoAnd? This isn't a discussion on the slave trade. I was pointing out that the origin of the comment was by a biased source, which changes the context of the text to thinly veiled racism. And by biased source, I mean a racist idiot promoting his shitty ideas.
- kofejnik 10y agoso your only argument is ad hominem, pure and simple
- 67726e 10y agoEvery race had been subjugated violently by another. Claiming one deserves special treatment is itself racist. Ask yourself this: Would the situation with the tweets be reversed if someone from the Barbary coast, which has a history of white slavery, reported the two tweets?