4 ms·
I don't understand why your post implies that compilers produce... what? schematics of capacitors, resistors and inductors?
by drivebyacct 16y ago
I don't understand why your post implies that compilers produce... what? schematics of capacitors, resistors and inductors?
- sown 16y agoWell, I was wondering, if they are so super parallelable then shouldn't I do something to take advantage of that? They say CPUs with many, many cores are not too far off and that software is the issue. Programmers don't write code to take advantage of it, I'm told. I was just wondering
- drivebyacct 16y agoWell, considering that parallelism among two, three or four cores is already a problem for "classic" programming... I mean, we've hit the limit on speed for CPU until some magical graphite stuff comes out, so we've moved to multiple cores. Multiple cores are great for programs that can utilize them, but as I understand it, it's generally considered difficult to write truly parallel code in a language like C or C++. (source, my crazy Comp Systems & Organizations teacher, plus it kinda makes sense). I suppose it doesn't answer your question about "super parallelable" but I would assume that any compiler that generates code for simultaneous execution based on a language that lets you write such code would simply be adapted to the new "super parallel" level. The problem comes down to the fact that you can just throw a regular program at a compiler and expect it to magically become parallelized.