3 ms·
Because it's extra, unnecessary cruft. May as well throw in generics as well, and inheritance and may as well develop your own OS for go while you're at it. As
by AlphaSite 10y ago
Because it's extra, unnecessary cruft. May as well throw in generics as well, and inheritance and may as well develop your own OS for go while you're at it.
As you can tell I think this is just a silly waste of time for a compiler. Non native applications are near universally ugly and poorly designed and adding a custom font is just another slap in the face.
- enneff 10y ago> Because it's extra, unnecessary cruft. May as well throw in generics as well, and inheritance and may as well develop your own OS for go while you're at it. False equivalences are fun. :-) > As you can tell I think this is just a silly waste of time for a compiler. But the people who did this have nothing to do with the compiler.
- randomdata 10y agoExtra cruft from a technical perspective, but it is clear that the law was the primary driver here.