3 ms·
I wasn't aware of the enhancement in VS2015. I'll definitely look at that functionality. VS2015 has made up a lot of ground for what R# lacked but the static a
by hnrodey 10y ago
I wasn't aware of the enhancement in VS2015. I'll definitely look at that functionality.
VS2015 has made up a lot of ground for what R# lacked but the static analysis still isn't there. You have to learn what errors/notes mean and how to interpret the results because they are very meaningful. Point blank - writing code with Resharper will lead to higher quality code.
And yeah, some part of my Resharper love is just an old habit. I've been using R# since VS2005 when the IDE lacked a lot of critical features that R# plugged. Now a lot of it is just habits and keyboard shortcuts and it's only a few hundred dollars for a license which still pays for itself throughout the course of the year.
- mattmanser 10y agoI simply disagree about higher quality code. One of my junior colleagues once did a "let's apply a bunch of resharper recommendations". It was not pretty. Its suggestions are almost always pedantic and puerile that don't improve code quality in any meaningful way, at least in the out-of-the-box config. It's nice when it picks up some stupidity like an always false condition, but the out-of-the-box instance has so many stupid rules that after turning more and more off it off, I gave up on it. And this isn't the first time I've given it a go.