4 ms·
A. Landlords can most certainly terminate your lease because of that. They can't throw you out immediately because of tenant protection laws, and they have to l
by relics443 10y ago
A. Landlords can most certainly terminate your lease because of that. They can't throw you out immediately because of tenant protection laws, and they have to let you get your belongings once you're evicted.
B. ToS are just as legally binding as a lease (provided they are presented in the right manner, which is how Google presents them). No one cares of you actually read them or not. As soon as you check the box that said you read and agree to them, you're legally bound to follow them.
C. No one ever said that repercussions have to match the violation. As I said, perhaps suspending the account is the only way Google can comply or protect themselves legally.
D. Google has no interest in attacking anyone. They simply follow the protocol they set for this occurrence.
The common denominator here seems to be that people are getting outraged that they can't break the rules and get away with it.
- Hnrobert42 10y agoAre you seriously trying to argue the current ToS situation is reasonable? Seriously?
- relics443 10y agoI'm telling you a fact. A ToS is legally binding. Outrage, and wishing it weren't so won't change that.
- ocdtrekkie 10y agoActually, many aren't. Many Terms of Service agreements or EULAs are looked at quite critically today because of the fact that companies reasonably expect that nobody has read them. Sensible provisions tend to be upheld, unfair ones... aren't always. If I install an app, and buried in it's EULA is a requirement that I become their indentured servant, it isn't enforceable.
- Asooka 10y ago5¢ have been deposited to your Google Wallet.