4 ms·
Yeah, very legal. The "right of first sale" means that you can't be sued (well, you can be sued but they would lose) if you sell a book you own. It doesn't sa
by drewcrawford 10y ago
Yeah, very legal.
The "right of first sale" means that you can't be sued (well, you can be sued but they would lose) if you sell a book you own. It doesn't say that the publisher of that book must continue to sell you additional copies or that the author won't give you a dirty look if you pass in the street or that someone may take steps that don't involve suing you for copyright infringement to discourage your activity.
This is, by the way, the same trick that powers RHEL – the binaries are all GPL, so you can totally redistribute them to anyone. If you do though, RHEL will cancel your account.
You own your data but not the servers on which that data is stored, so you can't compel Google to give you access to it, any more than you can compel me to produce your comment from my browser cache if you lose it. Refusing to give you access to their servers definitely isn't theft.
Very legal. Arguably unethical, but that's a different question.
- Y_Y 10y agoAs a quick aside, Google EU is based in Ireland, and under Ireland's data protection legislation you _are_ entitled to data the Google stores (including whatever tracking they're doing that you don't normally have access to). > Under Section 4 of the Data Protection Acts, 1988 and 2003, > you have a right to obtain a copy, clearly explained, of any > information relating to you kept on computer or in a structured > manual filing system or intended for such a system by any entity or organisation
- brazzledazzle 10y agoDoes RHEL sign the binaries or embed a signature somewhere on a per-customer basis to determine if you're redistributing?