No, small is good. But C isn't small. It's actually massive, and not terribly orthogonal. It's peppered with special cases, and things people think but aren't a

No, small is good. But C isn't small. It's actually massive, and not terribly orthogonal. It's peppered with special cases, and things people think but aren't actually true (how would you check for an integer overflow in C?). It's like comparing x86 to, say, m68k (or most things, really). One was designed. The other is an ungainly mess of hacks on top of hacks, which has a good, elegant design in there somewhere, desparately trying to get out. Guess which one is x86. Now guess which one is C. Worse really is better. Or at least, good enough. C isn't a complete mess, and you can write good code in it if you're very careful, but it's not great.