2 ms·

Call in Ramanujan. He'll surely come up with a good explanation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srinivasa_Ramanujan#Hardy.E2.80.93Ramanujan_number_1729 https://

by vram22 10y ago

Call in Ramanujan. He'll surely come up with a good explanation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srinivasa_Ramanujan#Hardy.E2.80.93Ramanujan_number_1729 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srinivasa_Ramanujan#Hardy.E2.8...

gjm11 10y ago
"No! It is a very interesting number. It is the smallest positive integer that Microsoft have not yet used as a version number."
- oerpli 10y ago
  Actually that would be 13.0!