> I guess it's just a question of words and goals being a little bit too overlapping. Rust's approach is to address safety as in the rates of defects. However i

> I guess it's just a question of words and goals being a little bit too overlapping. Rust's approach is to address safety as in the rates of defects. However it does nothing, and probably cannot, address the security i.e. the impact on my own safety or that of my assets. To me it seems like this is more of an implementation detail and not language-specific.