3 ms·
> Cost is a major reason people don't switch to OS X. Cost is a lot more than the physical machine. This is why Linux machines while technically less expensiv
by astrodust 10y ago
> Cost is a major reason people don't switch to OS X.
Cost is a lot more than the physical machine.
This is why Linux machines while technically less expensive (no OS license) are actually more expensive in terms of support. Until that nut can be cracked it's hard to get wide-scale adoption (e.g. 50% deskops vs. 5%).
- chtfn 10y agoDo you have a reliable ref for the cost comparison?
- astrodust 10y agoIBM does studies, though they are to be taken with a grain of salt. http://www.cio.com/article/3001871/macbook/switch-to-macs-from-pcs-reportedly-saves-ibm-270-per-user.html http://www.cio.com/article/3001871/macbook/switch-to-macs-fr... Thing is they're one of the few companies that are proponents of both Mac and Linux (plus their own UNIX variant) as well as Windows. It really depends on the company and the nature of work people are doing. Some software is a mess on anything but Windows. Some software is actually better on Linux.