4 ms·
Thanks! I was hoping I would be able to get rid of ReSharper, but the lack of CamelHumps in navigation and in code completion will force me to keep using.
by PerfectElement 10y ago
Thanks! I was hoping I would be able to get rid of ReSharper, but the lack of CamelHumps in navigation and in code completion will force me to keep using.
- omerraviv 10y agoPersonally they'll have to pry ReSharper from my cold, dead, hands - I've grown to rely on more advanced features like Value Origins/Destination https://www.jetbrains.com/help/resharper/2016.2/Code_Analysis__Value_Tracking.html https://www.jetbrains.com/help/resharper/2016.2/Code_Analysi... That I couldn't possibly go back.
- nathanaldensr 10y agoGood God I love ReSharper. I've been using it since the mid 2000s. It's a wonderful tool. However, their more recent releases have introduced some pretty annoying regressions with code formatting and other features. They seem to be ignoring my hand-reported issues on YouTrack. I haven't been as impressed with ReSharper as in the past. Hopefully they can right the ship and put out better quality stuff.
- LyalinDotCom 10y agoVisual Studio already supports Camel Hump search in IntelliSense and for symbols within GoTo. It’s currently missing for file names in Go To, but we’re working on that and it should be coming soon. P.s. I work on the extended VS team.