4 ms·
So, the issue is not the content of the emails, but the fact that they were leaked?
by fixxer 10y ago
So, the issue is not the content of the emails, but the fact that they were leaked?
- philk10 10y agounless you were interested in risotto recipes, yes
- yolesaber 10y agoOr widespread and obvious collusion and corruption? Don't be thick, these emails revealed just how sleazy and inept the DNC is. The establishment left needs a serious overhaul if they want to do anything of substance in the next four years
- 91bananas 10y agoThis is hyperbole. It seems implicitly that you're saying the right doesn't need a similar cleansing.
- yolesaber 10y agoAs far as I am concerned, most of the right in Congress can talk a long walk off a short pier. Crystal clear?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- philovivero 10y agoHow can anyone in this day and age assume when someone speaks poorly of a massive, corrupt oganisation that they think highly of another massive, corrupt organisation? Shouldn't we assume that everyone outside of those massive, corrupt organisations are tired of the status quo?
- grzm 10y ago"How can anyone in this day and age assume when someone speaks poorly of a massive, corrupt oganisation that they think highly of another massive, corrupt organisation?" I'd so love for this to be the case. Unfortunately that doesn't appear to be empirically true. There's a lot of political discussion just on HN that shows it's hard for people to grant the other side (whatever other happens to be) that benefit of the doubt. It does take work, though.
- alva 10y agoI am not trying to get into a who was right/wrong Trump/Clinton/FBI debate. I would like to know why you jokingly assert there was no serious, damaging substance in the leak contents? Although partisan, this site [0] reveals some very concerning actions. [0] http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/ http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/