> Twitter is a mandatory medium for public communication. That's the precise difference. There are two solutions I envisage for Twitter's behaviour. One is a

> Twitter is a mandatory medium for public communication. That's the precise difference. There are two solutions I envisage for Twitter's behaviour. One is a market solution of people moving away from it (e.g. towards Gab). This might be infeasible due to network effects. The other is regulation: communication services above a certain size be required to be an open platform. This would still allow twitter to ban people, but anyone would be allowed to re-used Twitter's data feed making it much easier to set up a competitor. > censorship on Twitter is worse than in a subreddit Not least because anyone can set up their own subreddit with their own moderation rules.