8 ms·
It's one thing to suggest that the police will pay greater attention to high profile cases (with which I'd agree), and quite another thing to imply that the rai
by zts 16y ago
It's one thing to suggest that the police will pay greater attention to high profile cases (with which I'd agree), and quite another thing to imply that the raid happened because Apple requested it.
Beyond that, could you point out the source of your assertion that Apple requested this? I missed it in the article, and that's the conspiracy you've raised.
- nailer 16y agoIf I were Apple, I'd ask the police to get the phone back from Jason Chen, hire my own people to get his address, and let the police do what they will, knowing that likely means a raid. I'm not sure what the alternative would be.
- gjm11 16y ago1. Apple already had the phone; Gizmodo sent it back to them. 2. "If I were Apple, I would have done X" does not in any way imply "Apple did X".
- nailer 16y ago1. Interesting. So what was the purpose of the raid? 2. Agreed. There may be a remote chance the police just read the internet and really, really care about apple. But I doubt it.
- infinite8s 16y agoThe purpose of the raid was to determine who sold the phone to Gizmodo. Hence their defense using the journalist shield law.