3 ms·
They obviously have agenda. Perhaps some restrictions on apps are coming into legislation and they want to "soften" the public on the matter or just "test the w
by elcct 10y ago
They obviously have agenda. Perhaps some restrictions on apps are coming into legislation and they want to "soften" the public on the matter or just "test the waters". Same type of "journalism" you can see in illegal drugs themed articles
- usrusr 10y ago> They obviously have agenda. Could a desire for safe roads be one? Drivers on smartphones kill.
- elcct 10y agoDrivers that are not fit to drive kill. In this case drivers that cannot pay attention to the road. Smartphones have nothing to do with that.
- usrusr 10y agoThe lure of the smartphone is pushing a number of drivers over the threshold of insufficient attention. They would be less distracted without. It's not like drivers had an individually fixed amount of distraction that they would distribute on whatever media at hand, it's the attention that is limited and far too many drivers don't allocate it correctly when their phone is around. Unfortunately, using a smartphone while driving is far more common than using the newspaper while driving has ever been. This has everything to do with the difference between smartphones and newspapers.
- TeMPOraL 10y agoOr they just know that they have a significant population of readers who think computers and smartphones are unnatural, evil and genetically modified poison, and that they have another significant population of readers who will call them out on the bullshit. Igniting a powderkeg of polarized readers is a great way to drive traffic, and therefore ad money. Yes, it seems like standard operating procedure for contemporary media.
- elcct 10y agoThis sadly can also be true.