3 ms·
Also, just look at that graph they posted (can't be linked to because the labels are not included in the png file). Biggest spike in 50 years? More like a minor
by m_mueller 10y ago
Also, just look at that graph they posted (can't be linked to because the labels are not included in the png file). Biggest spike in 50 years? More like a minor blip in a steady downwards trend.
- varjag 10y agoThat blip is probably thousands of dead people.
- zaroth 10y agoThat graph is probably millions of dead people.
- varjag 10y agoThere were 1.25 million estimated road fatalities worldwide in 2015, so a 1% blip would amount to 12.5 thousand. So yes this blip represents very real entirely avoidable deaths, as the offset of the traditional downward trend suggests.
- zaroth 10y agoWho said anything about worldwide fatalities? Apples and oranges. "Entirely avoidable" is a strange term in this context. All 1.25 million deaths were technically avoidable, but not without causing significantly worse harm, suffering, and death instead. We don't actually know what caused the increase, right now we're just speculating. Now, the NHTSA puts a $6.0 million price tag on the economic value of preventing a US traffic fatality, and based on that figure we prevent as much as we can.