3 ms·
Correct, but the language throughout article would likely lead a reader to assume birds are not part of the dinosaur family, since it's never implied that birds
by yareally 10y ago
Correct, but the language throughout article would likely lead a reader to assume birds are not part of the dinosaur family, since it's never implied that birds are dinosaurs either. Pesky implicits can be a pain in more than just programming sometimes.
- vilhelm_s 10y agoIt does state "Oviraptorosaurs are not direct ancestors of birds, but share a common theropod dinosaur ancestor with the lineage that later evolved to birds."