4 ms·
I'm assuming they took the cameras to prove that it was one of those cameras that was used to take photos of the phone, thus proving it was in his possession.
by sh1mmer 16y ago
I'm assuming they took the cameras to prove that it was one of those cameras that was used to take photos of the phone, thus proving it was in his possession.
Since he is employed it is up to Gawker to make sure he has equipment. Can they fire him for having his equipment seized? Wouldn't that be unlawful dismissal?