3 ms·
The headline seems fine to me. Your complaint seems to be that you think "CRISPR gene-editing" should only refer to editing of cells while they are still inside
by guelo 10y ago
The headline seems fine to me. Your complaint seems to be that you think "CRISPR gene-editing" should only refer to editing of cells while they are still inside a live body. But I don't see why that specific type of therapy should claim full ownership of the term "CRISPR gene-editing". Grammatically, any therapy that uses CRISPR modified genes would qualify.
- andygates 10y agoWatch the low-quality comments for an illustration of how to misread that headline as "We edited a human! I want wings and a giant pulsating brain!" /s