Because if I link to specific articles, it becomes about those articles, how the writers of them have their own axes to grind (e.g. William M. Connolley in http

Because if I link to specific articles, it becomes about those articles, how the writers of them have their own axes to grind (e.g. William M. Connolley in http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2016/11/14/judith-curry-wtf/ http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2016/11/14/judith-curry-wtf/ or http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2014/08/ipcc-attribution-statements-redux-a-response-to-judith-curry/ http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2014/08/ipcc-a...), how the magazines and websites involved are all liberal mouthpieces (e.g. Scientific American via Nature.com, http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101101/full/news.2010.577.html http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101101/full/news.2010.577.ht...). Perhaps the most balanced article easily found is this one from the commie pinko NPR: http://www.npr.org/2013/08/22/213894792/uncertain-science-judith-currys-take-on-climate-change http://www.npr.org/2013/08/22/213894792/uncertain-science-ju... Re: William M. Connolley, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Connolley https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Connolley as a starting point to differentiate from many others with slight name variations. edit: link in the wrong place