5 ms·

>the forerunner of all messengers ...erm... IRC? write? talk? CBBS? No?

by qwertyuiop924 10y ago

bluedino 10y ago
Those aren't really messengers.
- qwertyuiop924 10y ago
  Define "messenger." All of the above (save perhaps write) allow two users to converse freely, over a network. Sounds like a messenger to me.
- jandrese 10y ago
  Unix talk is pretty close. Also, BBS chat software would be another good example, although that was somewhat rare since few BBS systems had multiple lines and even on the ones that did you wouldn't just hang out waiting to chat. I missed the low UIN boat on ICQ because I was solidly into FreeBSD back then and the ICQ client was only on Windows. It also looked sketchy as hell with the crudely drawn flower icon and public domain sound effects. I didn't join for years and ended up with a barely 7 digit UIN.
  - Tempest1981 10y ago
    The flower icon reminds me of the 60s Austin Powers vibe. Wonder if that was the intent?
  - qwertyuiop924 10y ago
    What about IRC?
    - pmlnr 10y ago
      IRC is not a messenger-type thing; it's not a local client, it never had a system-wide single handle - you had to register on each network, if it was possible at all. The typing and receiving may be similar, but the approach is different.
    - jandrese 10y ago
      I seem IRC as more of a group chat application. You could direct message people on it, but its purpose was closer to a forum than a messaging app.
  - khedoros1 10y ago
    I had a friend that would only talk over ICQ, waaaay after its heyday. I don't remember when I created the account, but I ended up with a 9-digit ID...which I somehow still remember. I was able to log in for the first time in probably 3 years (and input my password for about the first time in 10 years. Pidgin had been configured to auto-login to ICQ on a previous machine of mine).
PerfectDlite 10y ago
IMO he missed Windows there, like 'forerunner of all Windows messengers'.
sedachv 10y ago
Also PLATO
- technofiend 10y ago
  Which happily is still around! https://cyber1.org/index.asp https://cyber1.org/index.asp
  - qwertyuiop924 10y ago
    Huh. I was thinking of the Archemides for some reason. That makes much more sense.
lmm 10y ago
IRC did not have persistent user identities. (IRC+memoserv perhaps, but that "feels" more like email than like a messenger). The others weren't internet-wide were they?
- qwertyuiop924 10y ago
  Talk was. And BBSes were area-wide (and later, practically net-wide with the advent of Fidonet).

>the forerunner of all messengers ...erm... IRC? write? talk? CBBS? No?

bluedino 10y ago

Those aren't really messengers.

qwertyuiop924 10y ago
Define "messenger." All of the above (save perhaps write) allow two users to converse freely, over a network. Sounds like a messenger to me.
jandrese 10y ago
Unix talk is pretty close. Also, BBS chat software would be another good example, although that was somewhat rare since few BBS systems had multiple lines and even on the ones that did you wouldn't just hang out waiting to chat. I missed the low UIN boat on ICQ because I was solidly into FreeBSD back then and the ICQ client was only on Windows. It also looked sketchy as hell with the crudely drawn flower icon and public domain sound effects. I didn't join for years and ended up with a barely 7 digit UIN.
- Tempest1981 10y ago
  The flower icon reminds me of the 60s Austin Powers vibe. Wonder if that was the intent?
- qwertyuiop924 10y ago
  What about IRC?
  - pmlnr 10y ago
    IRC is not a messenger-type thing; it's not a local client, it never had a system-wide single handle - you had to register on each network, if it was possible at all. The typing and receiving may be similar, but the approach is different.
  - jandrese 10y ago
    I seem IRC as more of a group chat application. You could direct message people on it, but its purpose was closer to a forum than a messaging app.
- khedoros1 10y ago
  I had a friend that would only talk over ICQ, waaaay after its heyday. I don't remember when I created the account, but I ended up with a 9-digit ID...which I somehow still remember. I was able to log in for the first time in probably 3 years (and input my password for about the first time in 10 years. Pidgin had been configured to auto-login to ICQ on a previous machine of mine).

PerfectDlite 10y ago

IMO he missed Windows there, like 'forerunner of all Windows messengers'.

sedachv 10y ago

Also PLATO

technofiend 10y ago
Which happily is still around! https://cyber1.org/index.asp https://cyber1.org/index.asp
- qwertyuiop924 10y ago
  Huh. I was thinking of the Archemides for some reason. That makes much more sense.

lmm 10y ago

IRC did not have persistent user identities. (IRC+memoserv perhaps, but that "feels" more like email than like a messenger). The others weren't internet-wide were they?

qwertyuiop924 10y ago
Talk was. And BBSes were area-wide (and later, practically net-wide with the advent of Fidonet).