3 ms·
Why not bother linking if the things she has said are so obviously wrong?
by barney54 10y ago
Why not bother linking if the things she has said are so obviously wrong?
- fencepost 10y agoBecause if I link to specific articles, it becomes about those articles, how the writers of them have their own axes to grind (e.g. William M. Connolley in http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2016/11/14/judith-curry-wtf/ http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2016/11/14/judith-curry-wtf/ or http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2014/08/ipcc-attribution-statements-redux-a-response-to-judith-curry/ http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2014/08/ipcc-a...), how the magazines and websites involved are all liberal mouthpieces (e.g. Scientific American via Nature.com, http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101101/full/news.2010.577.html http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101101/full/news.2010.577.ht...). Perhaps the most balanced article easily found is this one from the commie pinko NPR: http://www.npr.org/2013/08/22/213894792/uncertain-science-judith-currys-take-on-climate-change http://www.npr.org/2013/08/22/213894792/uncertain-science-ju... Re: William M. Connolley, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Connolley https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Connolley as a starting point to differentiate from many others with slight name variations. edit: link in the wrong place