4 ms·
These other nuclear sources (non-commercial plants) are an absolute apples-to-oranges comparison. Those are non-commercial implementations are absolutely NOT p
by Pokepokalypse 10y ago
These other nuclear sources (non-commercial plants) are an absolute apples-to-oranges comparison.
Those are non-commercial implementations are absolutely NOT profitable.
When we're talking about whether it can be done safely, what we're really talking about is whether it can be done safely AND in a free-enterprise for-profit model.
The answer is very obvioulsy: No, it can not. Especially when you have to factor-in external costs like: "oops, my plant exploded, and now I have just exposed 15 million people to non-trivial doses of dozens of radionucleides which will now impact their health for decades, plus. . . there's the 150,000 or so who can no longer live in their homes, or farm the land their families have farmed for generations, because we wanted to give the shareholders an extra .05% dividend last quarter when we decided to defer maintenance.
- stale2002 10y agoOops, my dam broke. I just killed a million people. The actual, worst case scenarios for other power sources are way worse than anything that nuclear has ever caused. I'd rather have a Chernobyl happen every single year like like clockwork, than a dam breaking and killing millions, like the one that happened in China. Or deal with the continued effects of coal. A Chernobyl every single year is better than coal. That's how bad coal is.
- ceejayoz 10y agoBetter go after hydro power, then. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam