3 ms·
It's very clear from the context - which you've omitted - that they meant the selection part rather than the mutation part: "random mutation is an important el
by sambe 10y ago
It's very clear from the context - which you've omitted - that they meant the selection part rather than the mutation part:
"random mutation is an important element in evolution, but less important than the process of natural selection, which is not random at all"
So their point is that random mutation occurs but is then filtered non-randomly, like a high-pass filter on noise. It's still a bit of an overstatement to say "not random at all" since there is obviously some (bad) luck in "fit" individuals dying or "unfit" individuals surviving. In the long-run though, you can see their point.
They go on to make a ridiculous claim that because you are here, nothing random happened to your ancestors. I would say it's just one possible history, and perhaps everyone makes mistakes with randomness.
- delinka 10y agoIt seems you're saying that the 'fitness algorithm' filters randomness and therefore the result is 'less random.' And while I can see your point, I'm of the mind that filtered noise is just less noise. But it's still noise.
- peeters 10y agoIf I give you a stream of decimal digits, and you filter out everything except for 9s, would you call the resulting stream as random as the input stream? How about if you filter every digit that is not exactly one more than the last unfiltered digit?