> The implication here is that somehow Trump conned people into voting for him. I don't know how you're getting that implication from the sentence you quoted.

> The implication here is that somehow Trump conned people into voting for him. I don't know how you're getting that implication from the sentence you quoted. > I put the probability precisely equal to Clinton holding the secret to politics and doing really well. She doesn't hold the secret to politics, she's just incredibly experienced. And, if there is a "secret to politics" it's very much the various things she was accused of: being double-faced, managing bribes, etc. Those things don't make you electable, they're just good at keeping you in power. Like I said, getting to power and staying in power are very different skillsets.