4 ms·
Saying it's vital is not going to help. the question is : how much time and money do we have to be carbon free. Is nuclear power helping to reach that target or
by wiz21c 10y ago
Saying it's vital is not going to help.
the question is : how much time and money do we have to be carbon free. Is nuclear power helping to reach that target or not ?
Saying it's vital is equivalent to saying "do we really really really want it ?" And of course, a lot of uniformed opinions will come up...
let me remind you that 1/ nuclear is bad when it breaks 2/ solar/wind is hyper expensive to build in quantities large enough to cover our needs
So which evil will we choose ?
- toyg 10y agoEasy: money is immaterial in the long run, the planet does not care whether it exists or not. Whereas nuclear waste, or the result of nuclear accidents, is a real threat to life.
- travelbyphone 10y agoI'd bet its best to pay more money now for huge benefits later, than save money now with huge risks later.
- adrianN 10y agoHow much time do we have left? About twenty years. http://trillionthtonne.org/ http://trillionthtonne.org/