How is that the problem? An obviously detectable "fake" news site is kinda benign compared to a serious looking outlet that tells the reader what they want to

How is that the problem? An obviously detectable "fake" news site is kinda benign compared to a serious looking outlet that tells the reader what they want to hear regardless of accuracy. Remember when Jon Stewart spent a decade arguing that Fox News was doing a disservice to the country? Do you think Breitbart, HuffPo or any of the Gawker properties do better at informing the public.