3 ms·
So you're in a memory-constrained environment, you can't be bothered to block social network tracking scripts by another means (some of those still load as pixe
by JasonSage 10y ago
So you're in a memory-constrained environment, you can't be bothered to block social network tracking scripts by another means (some of those still load as pixels so you haven't gotten rid of them entirely), you don't like fixed headers, footers, or sidebars, and you're taking it all out on this site because the fastest way they could bang out their little idea did not include server-side rendering in the initial iteration.
You're making a conscious decision based on the trade-offs at hand and saying that every website should double down on server side rendering to cater to your intolerance of how modern web browsing works. That's just not feasible.
- eeZah7Ux 10y ago3 billion people are in a bandwith, memory and CPU-constrained environment. 99% of websites can be written with or a minimum of javascript or not at all without losing any meaningful functionality.
- quickben 10y agoBut the website is down right not. Everything is resource constrained environment. With exposure to larger traffic hitting various services comes experience to not do things like that. Somebody had to keep the world running and some of us do care for proper engineering approaches.
- codedokode 10y agoI have a feeling that with Chrome any environment gets memory-constrained pretty fast. I have 3 (three) gigabytes of RAM (that can hold over 3 billion bytes inside) available to OS, is that not enough?