> Are you supposed to pick up and move if you don't like your neighbour's court No you aren't. Maybe you check this guy's reputation or you make a contract bef

> Are you supposed to pick up and move if you don't like your neighbour's court No you aren't. Maybe you check this guy's reputation or you make a contract before you buy a property close to him. Good neighborhood contracts (I don't recall the name right now) are common international politics, see the original article. If the guy's a reasonable person, he'll want to resolve it as well. If he's a villain, you'll have supporters throughout your community because you won't be his first victim. Start your embargo if you want. > Most things that hit the courts are not trade issues, for that matter. They aren't today because municipality / state laws act like additional clauses to your contract even if they are not mentioned in the contract. But if you make this stuff explicit, many things become contract (not trade) issues. There's btw no reason not to have a property that has exactly the same laws as the US today and allow people to enter it unless they disrespect the laws. The current system can live within a libertarian land, but not the other way round. Libertarian land is the more general one.