I did not misquote anything: "The only thing which can't be controlled is CO2. But this is not a pollutant." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12927586 http

I did not misquote anything: "The only thing which can't be controlled is CO2. But this is not a pollutant." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12927586 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12927586 "Maybe this will help to shift the focus to real pollutants, which actually harm human health, instead of CO2." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12915575 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12915575 And the sentence you yourself quoted is quite obviously missing an "of", given the poster's consistent view points on the issue. FWIW, I have had (and still have) an open dialogue with any trump supporter that wants it; one of them I even met up with directly from here. Reasonable discussion is fun and productive. But for similar reasons as why you don't negotiate with terrorists, I'm not going to bother arguing climate science with someone who believes it was designed as a conspiracy to make you vote Hillary or something. Edit: Besides, inopinatus already expressed what my thoughts were on the "assassination" issue.