4 ms·
Tactile feedback isn't a compelling argument against touchscreens on laptops and desktops? The touch interface on my phone and tablet compromises some of the u
by khedoros1 10y ago
Tactile feedback isn't a compelling argument against touchscreens on laptops and desktops?
The touch interface on my phone and tablet compromises some of the usability of the input to gain a ton of flexibility and portability. Laptops compromise some comfort and size to make it feasible to stick a keyboard and pointer device into a thin, portable computer.
The various compromises are worth it in some situations and very out-of-place in others. I don't really see the point of a touch interface for general desktop/laptop use.
- dpark 10y agoNo, I don't think "lack of tactile feedback" is, by itself, sufficient to demonstrate that touchscreens are a bad idea for laptops. There's nothing I can see about laptops that make the lack of tactile feedback a bigger concern than it is for other devices. Lack of tactile feedback might be a bigger problem on laptops, but the reason it's a bigger problem is not self evident.
- khedoros1 10y ago> here's nothing I can see about laptops that make the lack of tactile feedback a bigger concern than it is for other devices. Agreed, there's nothing about it that makes it a bigger concern for a laptop than other devices. Touchscreens as inputs are suboptimal on other devices too. They're uncomfortable, slow, and imprecise. I'm a huge fan of physical buttons. Sadly, it's impractical to have a phone with a screen large enough to be useful, thin enough to fit nicely in a pocket, and have it equipped with decent input.