4 ms·
Don't judge optimized pngs from this example. Those pngs look terrible. Here's what a 64 color png looks like created in Photoshop: http://i.imgur.com/4p2SW.pn
by xsmasher 17y ago
Don't judge optimized pngs from this example. Those pngs look terrible.
Here's what a 64 color png looks like created in Photoshop:
http://i.imgur.com/4p2SW.png http://i.imgur.com/4p2SW.png
It's smaller and better looking than the jpeg that they actually use on their home page:
http://www.turnkeylinux.org/files/images/icons/twiki.jpg?1256307560 http://www.turnkeylinux.org/files/images/icons/twiki.jpg?125...
The photoshop version would look even better and be even smaller if it were created from the uncompressed source instead of a jpg.
- chaosmachine 17y agoYou're right, these guys just don't know how to create indexed PNGs properly. I ran their originals through Photoshop, with 100% dither at 96 colors, then used pngout (the best* png compressor), and came out with better looking, smaller files. * http://advsys.net/ken/utils.htm http://advsys.net/ken/utils.htm