What is the big-O of rolling back bullshit viral posts? The viral posts get to spread organically, at a rate through the social graph equal to the appeal chanc

What is the big-O of rolling back bullshit viral posts? The viral posts get to spread organically, at a rate through the social graph equal to the appeal chance. However, to refute it, you must first research the response with sufficient veracity / references. That is probably the original 10x. But then you must move the refutation, which seems to have a much reduced virality factor, to the necessary places the viral bullshit spread. That would require constant searches of the graph. If the graph is "secured", then locating the instances/replications of the viral bullshit could be practically impossible. Even if you had access, the viral bullshit can replicate, since the very thing that makes it viral makes it memorable, and you'd need to do constant sweeps of the social graph to repress it.