3 ms·
Personally I find this tone to be a part of the problem. "Leftists" aren't saying anything proponents of the other party haven't said when their candidate lose
by partisan3883 10y ago
Personally I find this tone to be a part of the problem.
"Leftists" aren't saying anything proponents of the other party haven't said when their candidate loses.
The discussion at hand is about the imbalance in our election system as a whole. NOT this election.
There is ample data to suggest control of our government is not decided by the people put the parties. Gerrymandering and voter suppression are very real things. Both sides engage in it, but IMO the evidence suggests one party is "winning" more than the other because of it.
Candidates from outside these parties hardly have a voice thanks to these parties designing the rules around who is included.
That is a serious issue that's not being discussed on the whole.
Your comment is simply perpetuating the notion that things are fine and the other side is butt hurt. I somehow doubt in a world as complex as ours that's the easy answer. Especially when both sides are implicated by data that they're rigging the system.
It's not about a particular candidate for me. It's about a two party duopoly on our politics. If anyone wants to shake up the establishment, breaking that strangle hold is target. Not simply passing a baton to the candidate that appears more anti-establishment only for them to load up on pundits from an established party after the fact.
IMO the news media is only a system. The bigger issue has been here for years. It's our short term mentality when it comes to making decisions. Next quarter versus next year. Next election versus next generation.
This isn't a problem created by Twitter and 24/7 news. This has been going on since well before either existed. They've exacerbated it, but IMO the underlying issues are our deifying our economics. We don't talk about how to help each other directly. We just believe that growing our economy will magically make the world better.
No matter which side a player is on our system at the core right now is against the people. Not just us but our descendants. It's this short term vision of how to solve our problems (which usually means get the stock price up or some similar cold economic metric) and not about what's beneficial outside the bubble that is recent past and recent future.