3 ms·
AUTHOR HERE. For those who have been "chocked" or "disappointed" by the title of this series. All my apologies, but I assume this title. I did not wanted to off
by Triskell 10y ago
AUTHOR HERE. For those who have been "chocked" or "disappointed" by the title of this series. All my apologies, but I assume this title. I did not wanted to offense anyone.
Yes, this is how I explain it to her, there is no sexism in there. She is very smart, but not in the same domains, she loves history and books which I do not know anything about, so she wanted to understand what I do, just curiosity.
It won't be about her, I'm not a pervert to show her in my blog. But she inspired me this series. So, why not refereing to her in the title? That's a bit like a tribute to her who inspired me, that's sentimental. No offense.
(BTW, I she is a bit confused about some reactions, and she is glad I was thinking to her when I wrote those posts)
Again apoligies for those who thought it was sexist or anything else. By no mean I wanted to offend you.
- adityab 10y agoDon't worry, you're doing fine. There are a multitude of political opinions out there (which does not mean they are bad ideas), and a large number of people who like to criticize others based on this because they get to feel superior. Such people also think that everything (including the personal) is political and make no distinction between the intentional and unintentional. It's wise to just ignore them when the criticism is tangential. One only has finite mental bandwidth for these things, there is no way to cover the full combinatorial explosion of things that _could_ be interpreted as offensive.