3 ms·
That's not what the article is about. It's about misinformation; the fact that people are citing these sites and touting numbers that "prove" that Hilary lost o
by libeclipse 10y ago
That's not what the article is about. It's about misinformation; the fact that people are citing these sites and touting numbers that "prove" that Hilary lost on both electoral and popular vote.
- thisisdallas 10y ago> touting numbers that "prove" that Hilary lost on both electoral and popular vote. Which is moot point until someone can scientifically prove the person who's calculations showed Hillary losing the popular vote are indeed inaccurate, correct?
- 0xfeba 10y agoI've seen some (really condescending) comments doing just that. I thought they were on drugs or just trolls.