3 ms·
This is correct. The problem isn't capitalism, except in that we don't have enough of it. Our framework for private property won't recognize rights in air or ru
by CWuestefeld 10y ago
This is correct. The problem isn't capitalism, except in that we don't have enough of it. Our framework for private property won't recognize rights in air or running water, and so they become an easy sink for externalities.
If someone contaminates your land (say, by spilling heating oil), there's a well-defined path for recovering the damages. But since we don't recognize an owner of air or water, when those are contaminated, there's nobody who can claim damages.
By not fully recognizing property rights, we lose the ability to prevent polluters from externalizing their costs.
EDIT: s/Or/Our/
- sliverstorm 10y agoThe reason we don't recognize ownership of the air above your land is because we have no way to precisely track its flow and pollution. Land is easy to track, it doesn't go anywhere. It's a technical problem. Capitalism can't value something if it isn't capable of measuring it.